Pacific war Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

peaceful war - Essay ExampleHowever control of the sea was practicable only after island territories had been secured as bases for air and logistics sustenance. This visit equity in employment of land and air forces in conjunction with fighting ships. This created intense service rivalries primarily between the land and sea force directers. At the tactical direct allotment of forces for operations was on a task force basis and overcame the service biases to an extent. The key personalities pertain were of great significance. On one hand we have Douglas MacArthur, who has been referred to as the American Caesar an Army general with spotless professional reputation. Decorated in the First World War, he had the distinction of being recal lead on ready service on the outbreak of the Second World War and then placed in command of American forces in the Philippines.2 Overwhelmed by the Japanese in the Philippines, MacArthur was determined to return, an obsession to some extent whic h dictated some of his strategic proclivities in the years ahead. His reputation as a military commander survived his tribulation in the Philippines. ... He was considered the fore most authority on submarines in the US Navy. He is credit to have successfully halted the Japanese advance after the initial disaster of the Pearl Harbor and led the counter offensive in the pacific overcoming the deficiencies in supplies and ships by successive victories in the Battles of the Coral Sea, center(prenominal) and the Campaign in the Solomon Islands.3 The US Navy considered Nimitz as their mascot in the Pacific and despite the seniority derived function felt that he was the most suited for a joint command with quantitative superiority with the Navy. achievement as is commonly said has many fathers. The controversy of ascribing success of Allied victory in the Pacific to Nimitz or MacArthur is contained in a number of factors as inter service rivalry, lack of unity of command, the concomi tant success of the forces under each commander, strategic outlook and the personalities themselves. While each of these issues is important, the strategy ascribed to Nimitz and MacArthur would be a prime consideration which is being discussed along with other factors herein.The Strategic BackdropWith the tide of success having glum in favor of the Allies, at the Quadrant Conference at Quebec in August 1943, it was decided that devil lines of approach for subjugation of the Japanese be undertaken. In South West Pacific, General MacArthur was placed in command of the forces to undertake an offensive in Eastern New Guinea to include Wewak, the Admirality Islands and the Bismarck Archipelago, antagonise Rabaul and advance along the New Guinea coast to the Vogelkop peninsula. The second approach was to be through the primeval